Comparing both teams this season
Current league table
| # | Team | P | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 23 | +26 | 54 | |
| 2 | 23 | +17 | 42 | |
| 3 | 23 | +16 |
All Fixtures (30)
Style of play and derived stats from match data this season
Tap ? next to a stat for what it means.
| 42 |
| 4 | 23 | +3 | 36 |
| 5 | 23 | +8 | 33 |
| 6 | 23 | +8 | 33 |
| 7 | 23 | -3 | 32 |
| 8 | 23 | -1 | 31 |
| 9 | 23 | -4 | 30 |
| 10 | 23 | -1 | 29 |
| 11 | 23 | -5 | 28 |
| 12 | 22 | -9 | 28 |
| 13 | 23 | -8 | 27 |
| 14 | 23 | -12 | 23 |
| 15 | 22 | -20 | 22 |
| 16 | 23 | -15 | 21 |
All Fixtures (30)
A possession-oriented side averaging 62% possession Additionally, They've lost 2 games despite having more possession, indicating struggles converting dominance into results Meanwhile, Their ability to recover is valuable: 7 points gained after falling behind. They're mentally resilient, gaining significantly more points from losing positions than they drop from winning ones. Their attacking output is impressive: 15.8 shots per game, 6.0 finding the target. They move the ball forward with intent (around 27 passes per shot) Additionally, They maintain defensive discipline (8.0 fouls/game) Meanwhile, They're well-organized defensively (only 2.0 saves required per game). They generate many corner opportunities (6.5 corners/game).
a possession-oriented side averaging 62% possession
Read full analysisThey maintain balanced possession (46%). A concerning pattern: they've lost 3 games despite leading at the break Additionally, They've struggled to protect leads, dropping 13 points from winning positions. They prefer direct play over possession, averaging 341 passes per game.
They maintain balanced possession (46%)
Read full analysisUniversidad de Chile home games half time results
D. La Serena away games half time results