Comparing both teams this season
Current league table
| # | Team | P | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 36 | +21 | 68 | |
| 2 | 36 | +19 | 65 | |
| 3 | 36 | +24 |
All Fixtures (47)
Style of play and derived stats from match data this season
Tap ? next to a stat for what it means.
| 60 |
| 4 | 36 | +2 | 49 |
| 5 | 36 | +3 | 48 |
| 6 | 36 | -4 | 45 |
| 7 | 36 | -7 | 43 |
| 8 | 36 | -7 | 42 |
| 9 | 36 | -13 | 40 |
| 10 | 36 | -38 | 25 |
| 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
All Fixtures (39)
A possession-oriented side averaging 62% possession Meanwhile, Despite often having less possession, they've won 3 games, demonstrating tactical flexibility. A concerning pattern: they've lost 6 games with more possession, showing vulnerability when expected to create. They've lost 6 games despite having more possession, showing significant vulnerability when expected to control matches. They've shown strong resilience, winning 3 games after trailing at halftime Additionally, Their mental strength shows: 4 wins after conceding first Meanwhile, They've salvaged 16 points from losing positions this season. However, they've blown 3 leads after leading at halftime, showing vulnerability when ahead. Their game management needs work: 8 points dropped after taking the lead. Their game management is inconsistent: strong at comebacks but vulnerable when leading Additionally, They favor high-volume passing (512/game) but with a more direct approach (58% accuracy) Meanwhile, They're well-organized defensively (only 2.1 saves required per game). As a top-1 side facing another top-3 team, this represents a clash between quality opponents.
a possession-oriented side averaging 62% possession
Read full analysisThey maintain balanced possession (55%) Additionally, Despite often having less possession, they've won 5 games, demonstrating tactical flexibility Meanwhile, A concerning pattern: they've lost 5 games with more possession, showing vulnerability when expected to create. They've lost 5 games despite having more possession, showing significant vulnerability when expected to control matches. They've demonstrated resilience by winning 4 games after falling behind at some point. Their ability to recover is valuable: 14 points gained after falling behind Additionally, They've struggled to hold onto leads, losing 3 times after being ahead at halftime Meanwhile, They've dropped 12 points from winning positions, indicating issues closing out games. They're prolific chance creators, averaging 16.0 shots with 5.3 on target per game. They move the ball forward with intent (around 25 passes per shot). They maintain defensive discipline (8.9 fouls/game). As a top-3 side facing another top-1 team, this represents a clash between quality opponents.
They maintain balanced possession (55%)
Read full analysisShamrock Rovers home games half time results
St Patrick's Athl. away games half time results
Last 4 meetings