A quick view of what other users on Beathem are leaning toward in each market.
Comparing both teams this season
Style of play and derived stats from match data this season
Tap ? next to a stat for what it means.
Current league table
| # | Team | P | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 34 | +19 | 65 | |
| 2 | 34 | +19 | 62 | |
| 3 | 34 | +25 | 59 | |
| 4 | 34 | +2 | 46 | |
| 5 | 34 | +2 | 44 | |
| 6 | 34 | -5 | 42 | |
| 7 | 34 | -5 | 41 | |
| 8 | 34 | -10 | 37 | |
| 9 | 34 | -13 | 37 | |
| 10 | 34 | -34 | 24 |
All Fixtures (43)
All Fixtures (37)
They maintain balanced possession (52%). They've proven effective without the ball, winning 5 games with less possession Additionally, However, they've lost 8 games despite having more possession, suggesting they struggle to convert dominance into results Meanwhile, Their comeback ability is notable: 2 wins after being behind at the break. They're capable of turning games around, winning 3 times after going behind. They've gained 16 points from losing positions, showing they fight until the end. A concerning pattern: they've lost 2 games despite leading at the break Additionally, They've struggled to protect leads, dropping 21 points from winning positions Meanwhile, Their game management is inconsistent: strong at comebacks but vulnerable when leading. They move the ball forward with intent (around 31 passes per shot). Positioned 4th, they're facing a team 5 places below them in the table.
They maintain balanced possession (52%)
Read full analysisA reactive side with 39% average possession. They've proven effective without the ball, winning 7 games with less possession Additionally, However, they've lost 3 games despite having more possession, suggesting they struggle to convert dominance into results Meanwhile, Their comeback ability is notable: 2 wins after being behind at the break. They're capable of turning games around, winning 3 times after going behind. They've gained 15 points from losing positions, showing they fight until the end. A concerning pattern: they've lost 5 games despite leading at the break Additionally, They've struggled to protect leads, dropping 21 points from winning positions Meanwhile, Their game management is inconsistent: strong at comebacks but vulnerable when leading. They prefer direct play over possession, averaging 253 passes per game. They maintain defensive discipline (8.9 fouls/game). As a lower-table side (9th), they'll need to be disciplined against a top-4 opponent.
a reactive side with 39% average possession
Read full analysisShelbourne home games half time results
Drogheda United away games half time results
Last 4 meetings