Comparing both teams this season
Style of play and derived stats from match data this season
Tap ? next to a stat for what it means.
Current league table
| # | Team | P | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 25 | +32 | 55 | |
| 2 | 25 | +13 | 45 | |
| 3 | 25 | +11 | 44 | |
| 4 | 25 | +9 | 43 | |
| 5 | 25 | +13 | 40 | |
| 6 | 25 | +4 | 36 | |
| 7 | 25 | 0 | 36 | |
| 8 | 25 | -2 | 36 | |
| 9 | 25 | +6 | 34 | |
| 10 | 24 | -9 | 29 | |
| 11 | 25 | -12 | 29 | |
| 12 | 25 | -3 | 28 | |
| 13 | 25 | -12 | 24 | |
| 14 | 24 | -7 | 23 | |
| 15 | 25 | -9 | 23 | |
| 16 | 25 | -34 | 19 |
All Fixtures (35)
All Fixtures (32)
A counter-attacking team with 39% average possession. Their comeback ability is notable: 3 wins after being behind at the break. They've salvaged 13 points from losing positions this season Additionally, However, they've blown 2 leads after leading at halftime, showing vulnerability when ahead Meanwhile, Their game management needs work: 13 points dropped after taking the lead. Their game management is inconsistent: strong at comebacks but vulnerable when leading. They prefer direct play over possession, averaging 46 passes per game. Their chance quality is strong, with 39% of shots hitting the target Additionally, They maintain defensive discipline (1.6 fouls/game) Meanwhile, They're well-organized defensively (only 0.3 saves required per game). As a lower-table side (12th), they'll need to be disciplined against a top-3 opponent.
a counter-attacking team with 39% average possession
Read full analysisThis team they maintain balanced possession (48%). Despite often having less possession, they've won 4 games, demonstrating tactical flexibility. They don't give up easily, having won 2 games despite trailing at halftime Additionally, They've demonstrated resilience by winning 3 games after falling behind at some point Meanwhile, Their ability to recover is valuable: 11 points gained after falling behind. They've struggled to hold onto leads, losing 3 times after being ahead at halftime. They've dropped 7 points from winning positions, indicating issues closing out games. Their game management is inconsistent: strong at comebacks but vulnerable when leading Additionally, They prefer direct play over possession, averaging 77 passes per game Meanwhile, They maintain defensive discipline (3.8 fouls/game). They're well-organized defensively (only 0.3 saves required per game). They generate many corner opportunities (6.0 corners/game). A top-3 side facing a bottom-third opponent, they'll be expected to control this match.
They maintain balanced possession (48%)
Read full analysisLjungskile SK home games half time results
Varbergs BoIS FC away games half time results