Comparing both teams this season
Style of play and derived stats from match data this season
Tap ? next to a stat for what it means.
Current league table
| # | Team | P | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 32 | +14 | 58 | |
| 2 | 32 | +16 | 56 | |
| 3 | 32 | +15 | 48 | |
| 4 | 35 | -5 | 48 | |
| 5 | 34 | -3 | 47 | |
| 6 | 32 | -5 | 47 | |
| 7 | 32 | 0 | 42 | |
| 8 | 32 | -3 | 42 | |
| 9 | 33 | -2 | 41 | |
| 10 | 32 | -12 | 40 | |
| 11 | 32 | -3 | 37 | |
| 12 | 32 | -12 | 29 |
All Fixtures (45)
All Fixtures (37)
This team they maintain balanced possession (49%). They've won 8 games despite having less possession, showing they're effective without the ball. They've dropped points in 7 games despite controlling possession, indicating issues breaking down defenses Additionally, They don't give up easily, having won 2 games despite trailing at halftime Meanwhile, They've demonstrated resilience by winning 3 games after falling behind at some point. Their ability to recover is valuable: 11 points gained after falling behind. They've struggled to hold onto leads, losing 4 times after being ahead at halftime. They've dropped 15 points from winning positions, indicating issues closing out games Additionally, Their game management is inconsistent: strong at comebacks but vulnerable when leading Meanwhile, They prefer direct play over possession, averaging 328 passes per game. As a top-4 side facing another top-7 team, this represents a clash between quality opponents.
They maintain balanced possession (49%)
Read full analysisA counter-attacking team with 39% average possession. Despite often having less possession, they've won 9 games, demonstrating tactical flexibility. A concerning pattern: they've lost 3 games with more possession, showing vulnerability when expected to create Additionally, They've gained 8 points from losing positions, showing they fight until the end Meanwhile, A concerning pattern: they've lost 5 games despite leading at the break. They've struggled to protect leads, dropping 18 points from winning positions. They prefer direct play over possession, averaging 319 passes per game. Their attacking output is modest (9.0 shots/game).
a counter-attacking team with 39% average possession
Read full analysisRied home games half time results
TSV Hartberg away games half time results