Comparing both teams this season
Style of play and derived stats from match data this season
Tap ? next to a stat for what it means.
Current league table
| # | Team | P | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 32 | +14 | 58 | |
| 2 | 32 | +16 | 56 | |
| 3 | 32 | +15 | 48 | |
| 4 | 35 | -5 | 48 | |
| 5 | 34 | -3 | 47 | |
| 6 | 32 | -5 | 47 | |
| 7 | 32 | 0 | 42 | |
| 8 | 32 | -3 | 42 | |
| 9 | 33 | -2 | 41 | |
| 10 | 32 | -12 | 40 | |
| 11 | 32 | -3 | 37 | |
| 12 | 32 | -12 | 29 |
All Fixtures (44)
All Fixtures (37)
They maintain balanced possession (51%). They've proven effective without the ball, winning 8 games with less possession. However, they've lost 12 games despite having more possession, suggesting they struggle to convert dominance into results Additionally, A concerning pattern: they've lost 4 games despite leading at the break. They've struggled to protect leads, dropping 12 points from winning positions.
They maintain balanced possession (51%)
Read full analysisThis team they maintain balanced possession (45%). Despite often having less possession, they've won 8 games, demonstrating tactical flexibility. They don't give up easily, having won 3 games despite trailing at halftime Additionally, They've demonstrated resilience by winning 4 games after falling behind at some point Meanwhile, Their ability to recover is valuable: 15 points gained after falling behind. They've struggled to hold onto leads, losing 4 times after being ahead at halftime. They've dropped 14 points from winning positions, indicating issues closing out games. Their game management is inconsistent: strong at comebacks but vulnerable when leading Additionally, They prefer direct play over possession, averaging 342 passes per game. They're well-organized defensively (only 2.2 saves required per game).
They maintain balanced possession (45%)
Read full analysisWolfsberger AC home games half time results
WSG Wattens away games half time results
Last 4 meetings