Comparing both teams this season
Style of play and derived stats from match data this season
Tap ? next to a stat for what it means.
Current league table
| # | Team | P | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9 | +16 | 24 | |
| 2 | 9 | +8 | 19 | |
| 3 | 8 | +6 | 15 | |
| 4 | 8 | 0 | 15 | |
| 5 | 8 | -1 | 15 | |
| 6 | 8 | +4 | 13 | |
| 7 | 8 | +2 | 13 | |
| 8 | 9 | -1 | 12 | |
| 9 | 8 | -2 | 11 | |
| 10 | 8 | -3 | 9 | |
| 11 | 9 | -3 | 9 | |
| 12 | 9 | -4 | 8 | |
| 13 | 8 | -4 | 8 | |
| 14 | 9 | -9 | 5 | |
| 15 | 8 | -9 | 4 |
All Fixtures (16)
All Fixtures (13)
A counter-attacking team with 39% average possession Additionally, Their game management needs work: 6 points dropped after taking the lead Meanwhile, They prefer direct play over possession, averaging 326 passes per game. They prioritize getting into dangerous areas (8.4 shots inside the box per game). They generate volume but can be wasteful, with only 27% of attempts on target. Defensively, they're aggressive (16.3 fouls/game). Positioned 8th, they're facing a team 3 places below them in the table.
a counter-attacking team with 39% average possession
Read full analysisThey maintain balanced possession (49%). Their chance quality is strong, with 42% of shots hitting the target.
They maintain balanced possession (49%)
Read full analysisPatro Eisden home games half time results
KRC Genk II away games half time results