Comparing both teams this season
Current league table
All Fixtures (34)
Style of play and derived stats from match data this season
Tap ? next to a stat for what it means.
| 4 | 33 | +10 | 54 |
| 5 | 34 | +8 | 54 |
| 6 | 33 | +6 | 53 |
| 7 | 34 | +4 | 50 |
| 8 | 34 | +5 | 47 |
| 9 | 34 | +1 | 47 |
| 10 | 34 | 0 | 44 |
| 11 | 34 | -7 | 42 |
| 12 | 34 | -11 | 42 |
| 13 | 33 | -7 | 41 |
| 14 | 34 | -9 | 40 |
| 15 | 34 | -4 | 38 |
| 16 | 33 | -13 | 38 |
| 17 | 34 | -6 | 37 |
| 18 | 34 | -9 | 37 |
| 19 | 33 | -15 | 29 |
| 20 | 33 | -35 | 21 |
All Fixtures (34)
This team they maintain balanced possession (53%). They've proven effective without the ball, winning 3 games with less possession Additionally, However, they've lost 6 games despite having more possession, suggesting they struggle to convert dominance into results Meanwhile, Their ability to recover is valuable: 7 points gained after falling behind. They've struggled to hold onto leads, losing 6 times after being ahead at halftime. They've dropped 18 points from winning positions, indicating issues closing out games. While they take many shots (14.3/game), their accuracy is below par (29% on target) Additionally, They move the ball forward with intent (around 32 passes per shot) Meanwhile, Defensively, they're aggressive (13.3 fouls/game). They're well-organized defensively (only 2.4 saves required per game). They generate many corner opportunities (6.8 corners/game).
They maintain balanced possession (53%)
Read full analysisThey maintain balanced possession (55%). Despite often having less possession, they've won 4 games, demonstrating tactical flexibility. A concerning pattern: they've lost 3 games with more possession, showing vulnerability when expected to create Additionally, They've lost 3 games despite having more possession, indicating struggles converting dominance into results Meanwhile, They've shown strong resilience, winning 3 games after trailing at halftime. Their ability to recover is valuable: 10 points gained after falling behind. They've struggled to hold onto leads, losing 2 times after being ahead at halftime. They've dropped 6 points from winning positions, indicating issues closing out games Additionally, Their game management is inconsistent: strong at comebacks but vulnerable when leading Meanwhile, They're prolific chance creators, averaging 15.7 shots with 5.7 on target per game. They move the ball forward with intent (around 30 passes per shot). Defensively, they're aggressive (13.4 fouls/game).
They maintain balanced possession (55%)
Read full analysisSao Paulo home games half time results
Cruzeiro away games half time results