Comparing both teams this season
Style of play and derived stats from match data this season
Tap ? next to a stat for what it means.
Current league table
| # | Team | P | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 36 | +65 | 86 | |
| 2 | 36 | +25 | 68 | |
| 3 | 36 | +1 | 54 | |
| 4 | 36 | +13 | 53 | |
| 5 | 36 | -12 | 44 | |
| 6 | 36 | -11 | 43 | |
| 7 | 36 | -8 | 41 | |
| 8 | 36 | -15 | 41 | |
| 9 | 36 | -22 | 35 | |
| 10 | 36 | -36 | 28 |
All Fixtures (42)
All Fixtures (43)
This team a possession-oriented side averaging 58% possession. Despite often having less possession, they've won 5 games, demonstrating tactical flexibility Additionally, A concerning pattern: they've lost 7 games with more possession, showing vulnerability when expected to create Meanwhile, They've lost 7 games despite having more possession, showing significant vulnerability when expected to control matches. They've demonstrated resilience by winning 3 games after falling behind at some point. Their ability to recover is valuable: 12 points gained after falling behind. They've struggled to protect leads, dropping 6 points from winning positions Additionally, In attack, they create numerous opportunities (14.3 shots/game, 5.5 on target) Meanwhile, They prioritize getting into dangerous areas (10.1 shots inside the box per game). Their chance quality is strong, with 38% of shots hitting the target. They move the ball forward with intent (around 32 passes per shot). They're well-organized defensively (only 2.1 saves required per game). As a top-2 side facing another top-5 team, this represents a clash between quality opponents.
a possession-oriented side averaging 58% possession
Read full analysisThey maintain balanced possession (50%). They've proven effective without the ball, winning 5 games with less possession Additionally, However, they've lost 7 games despite having more possession, suggesting they struggle to convert dominance into results Meanwhile, Their comeback ability is notable: 2 wins after being behind at the break. They're capable of turning games around, winning 3 times after going behind. They've gained 17 points from losing positions, showing they fight until the end. A concerning pattern: they've lost 5 games despite leading at the break Additionally, They've struggled to protect leads, dropping 22 points from winning positions Meanwhile, Their game management is inconsistent: strong at comebacks but vulnerable when leading. Defensively, they're aggressive (14.1 fouls/game). They're well-organized defensively (only 2.3 saves required per game). Positioned 5th, they're facing a team 3 places above them in the table.
They maintain balanced possession (50%)
Read full analysisHNK Hajduk Split home games half time results
NK Lokomotiva Zagreb away games half time results
Last 4 meetings