Comparing both teams this season
Style of play and derived stats from match data this season
Tap ? next to a stat for what it means.
Current league table
| # | Team | P | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 36 | +65 | 86 | |
| 2 | 36 | +25 | 68 | |
| 3 | 36 | +1 | 54 | |
| 4 | 36 | +13 | 53 | |
| 5 | 36 | -12 | 44 | |
| 6 | 36 | -11 | 43 | |
| 7 | 36 | -8 | 41 | |
| 8 | 36 | -15 | 41 | |
| 9 | 36 | -22 | 35 | |
| 10 | 36 | -36 | 28 |
All Fixtures (48)
All Fixtures (42)
This team a team that dominates the ball averaging 58% possession. They've proven effective without the ball, winning 6 games with less possession Additionally, However, they've lost 4 games despite having more possession, suggesting they struggle to convert dominance into results Meanwhile, They've lost 4 games despite having more possession, showing significant vulnerability when expected to control matches. Their comeback ability is notable: 2 wins after being behind at the break. They're capable of turning games around, winning 3 times after going behind. They've gained 12 points from losing positions, showing they fight until the end Additionally, A concerning pattern: they've lost 2 games despite leading at the break Meanwhile, They've struggled to protect leads, dropping 4 points from winning positions. Their game management is inconsistent: strong at comebacks but vulnerable when leading. In attack, they create numerous opportunities (16.4 shots/game, 6.3 on target). Their chance quality is strong, with 38% of shots hitting the target Additionally, They move the ball forward with intent (around 29 passes per shot) Meanwhile, They're well-organized defensively (only 1.8 saves required per game). They generate many corner opportunities (6.3 corners/game). As a top-1 side facing another top-2 team, this represents a clash between quality opponents.
a team that dominates the ball averaging 58% possession
Read full analysisThis team a possession-oriented side averaging 58% possession. Despite often having less possession, they've won 5 games, demonstrating tactical flexibility Additionally, A concerning pattern: they've lost 7 games with more possession, showing vulnerability when expected to create Meanwhile, They've lost 7 games despite having more possession, showing significant vulnerability when expected to control matches. They've demonstrated resilience by winning 3 games after falling behind at some point. Their ability to recover is valuable: 12 points gained after falling behind. They've struggled to protect leads, dropping 6 points from winning positions Additionally, In attack, they create numerous opportunities (14.3 shots/game, 5.5 on target) Meanwhile, They prioritize getting into dangerous areas (10.1 shots inside the box per game). Their chance quality is strong, with 38% of shots hitting the target. They move the ball forward with intent (around 32 passes per shot). They're well-organized defensively (only 2.1 saves required per game). As a top-2 side facing another top-1 team, this represents a clash between quality opponents.
a possession-oriented side averaging 58% possession
Read full analysisDinamo Zagreb home games half time results
HNK Hajduk Split away games half time results
Last 4 meetings