Comparing both teams this season
Style of play and derived stats from match data this season
Tap ? next to a stat for what it means.
Current league table
| # | Team | P | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 36 | +65 | 86 | |
| 2 | 36 | +25 | 68 | |
| 3 | 36 | +1 | 54 | |
| 4 | 36 | +13 | 53 | |
| 5 | 36 | -12 | 44 | |
| 6 | 36 | -11 | 43 | |
| 7 | 36 | -8 | 41 | |
| 8 | 36 | -15 | 41 | |
| 9 | 36 | -22 | 35 | |
| 10 | 36 | -36 | 28 |
All Fixtures (45)
All Fixtures (48)
This team they maintain balanced possession (44%). Despite often having less possession, they've won 12 games, demonstrating tactical flexibility Additionally, A concerning pattern: they've lost 4 games with more possession, showing vulnerability when expected to create Meanwhile, They've demonstrated resilience by winning 4 games after falling behind at some point. Their ability to recover is valuable: 16 points gained after falling behind. They've struggled to hold onto leads, losing 3 times after being ahead at halftime. They've dropped 17 points from winning positions, indicating issues closing out games Additionally, They prefer direct play over possession, averaging 349 passes per game. As a top-3 side facing another top-1 team, this represents a clash between quality opponents.
They maintain balanced possession (44%)
Read full analysisThis team a team that dominates the ball averaging 58% possession. They've proven effective without the ball, winning 6 games with less possession Additionally, However, they've lost 4 games despite having more possession, suggesting they struggle to convert dominance into results Meanwhile, They've lost 4 games despite having more possession, showing significant vulnerability when expected to control matches. Their comeback ability is notable: 2 wins after being behind at the break. They're capable of turning games around, winning 3 times after going behind. They've gained 12 points from losing positions, showing they fight until the end Additionally, A concerning pattern: they've lost 2 games despite leading at the break Meanwhile, They've struggled to protect leads, dropping 4 points from winning positions. Their game management is inconsistent: strong at comebacks but vulnerable when leading. In attack, they create numerous opportunities (16.4 shots/game, 6.3 on target). Their chance quality is strong, with 38% of shots hitting the target Additionally, They move the ball forward with intent (around 29 passes per shot) Meanwhile, They're well-organized defensively (only 1.8 saves required per game). They generate many corner opportunities (6.3 corners/game). As a top-1 side facing another top-3 team, this represents a clash between quality opponents.
a team that dominates the ball averaging 58% possession
Read full analysisNK Varazdin home games half time results
Dinamo Zagreb away games half time results
Last 4 meetings