Predictions for this day Calendar

Tammelan Stadion, Tampere

Ilves

VS

Not Started

VPS

Ilves vs VPS predictions & stats

Top pick VPS 48%, Over 2.5 goals 43%. Free match analysis, team stats and betting tips for Veikkausliiga.

Veikkausliiga Standings

Current league table

#	Team	P	GD	Pts
1	KuPS	17	+16	36
2	Inter Turku	17	+10	31
3	HJK helsinki	17	+8	28
4	Gnistan	17	+6	28
5	VPS	17	+8	27
6	AC Oulu	17	0	27
7	Turku PS	18	+3	25
8	Lahti	17	+4	22
9	Ilves	17	-1	22
10	FF Jaro	17	-16	15
11	SJK	17	-8	14
12	Mariehamn	18	-30	5

Playing Style Analysis

Ilves

They maintain balanced possession (51%). However, they've blown 2 leads after leading at halftime, showing vulnerability when ahead Additionally, Their game management needs work: 11 points dropped after taking the lead Meanwhile, They struggle to manage games effectively, dropping far more points from winning positions than they gain from losing ones. They prefer direct play over possession, averaging 321 passes per game. Their chance quality is strong, with 51% of shots hitting the target. They maintain defensive discipline (6.0 fouls/game).

Ilves

They maintain balanced possession (51%)

Read full analysis

•They maintain balanced possession (51%).
•However, they've blown 2 leads after leading at halftime, showing vulnerability when ahead.
•Their game management needs work: 11 points dropped after taking the lead.
•They struggle to manage games effectively, dropping far more points from winning positions than they gain from losing ones.
•They prefer direct play over possession, averaging 321 passes per game.
•Their chance quality is strong, with 51% of shots hitting the target.
•They maintain defensive discipline (6.0 fouls/game).

VPS

This team they maintain balanced possession (51%). They don't give up easily, having won 2 games despite trailing at halftime. They've demonstrated resilience by winning 3 games after falling behind at some point. Their ability to recover is valuable: 10 points gained after falling behind Additionally, They've struggled to hold onto leads, losing 2 times after being ahead at halftime Meanwhile, They've dropped 6 points from winning positions, indicating issues closing out games. Their game management is inconsistent: strong at comebacks but vulnerable when leading. They prefer direct play over possession, averaging 204 passes per game. Their attacking output is modest (6.3 shots/game) Additionally, They're well-organized defensively (only 2.0 saves required per game). Positioned 5th, they're facing a team 4 places below them in the table.

VPS

They maintain balanced possession (51%)

Read full analysis

•They maintain balanced possession (51%).
•They don't give up easily, having won 2 games despite trailing at halftime.
•They've demonstrated resilience by winning 3 games after falling behind at some point.
•Their ability to recover is valuable: 10 points gained after falling behind.
•They've struggled to hold onto leads, losing 2 times after being ahead at halftime.
•They've dropped 6 points from winning positions, indicating issues closing out games.
•Their game management is inconsistent: strong at comebacks but vulnerable when leading.
•They prefer direct play over possession, averaging 204 passes per game.
•Their attacking output is modest (6.3 shots/game).
•They're well-organized defensively (only 2.0 saves required per game).
•Positioned 5th, they're facing a team 4 places below them in the table.