Predictions for this day Calendar

Lemonsoft Stadion, Vaasa

VPS

VS

Not Started

Inter Turku

VPS vs Inter Turku predictions & stats

Top pick Draw 44%, Over 2.5 goals 34%. Free match analysis, team stats and betting tips for Veikkausliiga.

Veikkausliiga Standings

Current league table

#	Team	P	GD	Pts
1	KuPS	25	+17	48
2	Inter Turku	25	+14	48
3	HJK helsinki	25	+10	42
4	Gnistan	25	+8	41
5	Lahti	25	+6	36
6	VPS	25	+5	36
7	Ilves	25	+4	34
8	AC Oulu	25	-3	34
9	Turku PS	25	+1	32
10	SJK	25	-7	24
11	Mariehamn	25	-27	17
12	FF Jaro	25	-28	17

Playing Style Analysis

VPS

They maintain balanced possession (51%). They've proven effective without the ball, winning 3 games with less possession. They've shown strong resilience, winning 2 games after trailing at halftime. Their mental strength shows: 3 wins after conceding first Additionally, They've salvaged 10 points from losing positions this season Meanwhile, However, they've blown 2 leads after leading at halftime, showing vulnerability when ahead. Their game management needs work: 6 points dropped after taking the lead. Their game management is inconsistent: strong at comebacks but vulnerable when leading. They prefer direct play over possession, averaging 244 passes per game Additionally, Their attacking output is modest (7.7 shots/game) Meanwhile, They're well-organized defensively (only 2.5 saves required per game). Positioned 6th, they're facing a team 4 places above them in the table.

VPS

They maintain balanced possession (51%)

Read full analysis

•They maintain balanced possession (51%).
•They've proven effective without the ball, winning 3 games with less possession.
•They've shown strong resilience, winning 2 games after trailing at halftime.
•Their mental strength shows: 3 wins after conceding first.
•They've salvaged 10 points from losing positions this season.
•However, they've blown 2 leads after leading at halftime, showing vulnerability when ahead.
•Their game management needs work: 6 points dropped after taking the lead.
•Their game management is inconsistent: strong at comebacks but vulnerable when leading.
•They prefer direct play over possession, averaging 244 passes per game.
•Their attacking output is modest (7.7 shots/game).
•They're well-organized defensively (only 2.5 saves required per game).
•Positioned 6th, they're facing a team 4 places above them in the table.

Inter Turku

They maintain balanced possession (56%). Their comeback ability is notable: 2 wins after being behind at the break. They've salvaged 7 points from losing positions this season. However, they've blown 2 leads after leading at halftime, showing vulnerability when ahead Additionally, Their game management needs work: 9 points dropped after taking the lead Meanwhile, Their game management is inconsistent: strong at comebacks but vulnerable when leading. They're selective but clinical, taking 9.6 shots per game with 42% accuracy. Their build-up is patient and slower-tempo (about 47 passes per shot). They're well-organized defensively (only 2.4 saves required per game). Positioned 2nd, they're facing a team 4 places below them in the table.

Inter Turku

They maintain balanced possession (56%)

Read full analysis

•They maintain balanced possession (56%).
•Their comeback ability is notable: 2 wins after being behind at the break.
•They've salvaged 7 points from losing positions this season.
•However, they've blown 2 leads after leading at halftime, showing vulnerability when ahead.
•Their game management needs work: 9 points dropped after taking the lead.
•Their game management is inconsistent: strong at comebacks but vulnerable when leading.
•They're selective but clinical, taking 9.6 shots per game with 42% accuracy.
•Their build-up is patient and slower-tempo (about 47 passes per shot).