Predictions for this day Calendar

Lahden Stadion, Lahti

Lahti

0-2

HT: 0 - 0

FULL TIME

Inter Turku

Veikkausliiga Standings

Current league table

#	Team	P	GD	Pts
1	KuPS	25	+17	48
2	Inter Turku	25	+14	48
3	HJK helsinki	25	+10	42
4	Gnistan	25	+8	41
5	Lahti	25	+6	36
6	VPS	25	+5	36
7	Ilves	25	+4	34
8	AC Oulu	25	-3	34
9	Turku PS	25	+1	32
10	SJK	25	-7	24
11	Mariehamn	25	-27	17
12	FF Jaro	25	-28	17

Playing Style Analysis

Lahti

This team a team that dominates the ball averaging 62% possession. They've lost 2 games despite having more possession, indicating struggles converting dominance into results Additionally, They've struggled to hold onto leads, losing 2 times after being ahead at halftime Meanwhile, They've dropped 15 points from winning positions, indicating issues closing out games. They move the ball forward with intent (around 32 passes per shot). They're well-organized defensively (only 2.0 saves required per game). Positioned 5th, they're facing a team 3 places above them in the table.

Lahti

a team that dominates the ball averaging 62% possession

Read full analysis

•a team that dominates the ball averaging 62% possession.
•They've lost 2 games despite having more possession, indicating struggles converting dominance into results.
•They've struggled to hold onto leads, losing 2 times after being ahead at halftime.
•They've dropped 15 points from winning positions, indicating issues closing out games.
•They move the ball forward with intent (around 32 passes per shot).
•They're well-organized defensively (only 2.0 saves required per game).
•Positioned 5th, they're facing a team 3 places above them in the table.

Inter Turku

They maintain balanced possession (56%). Their comeback ability is notable: 2 wins after being behind at the break. They've salvaged 7 points from losing positions this season. However, they've blown 2 leads after leading at halftime, showing vulnerability when ahead Additionally, Their game management needs work: 9 points dropped after taking the lead Meanwhile, Their game management is inconsistent: strong at comebacks but vulnerable when leading. They're selective but clinical, taking 9.6 shots per game with 42% accuracy. Their build-up is patient and slower-tempo (about 47 passes per shot). They're well-organized defensively (only 2.4 saves required per game). As a top-2 side facing another top-5 team, this represents a clash between quality opponents.

Inter Turku

They maintain balanced possession (56%)

Read full analysis

•They maintain balanced possession (56%).
•Their comeback ability is notable: 2 wins after being behind at the break.
•They've salvaged 7 points from losing positions this season.
•However, they've blown 2 leads after leading at halftime, showing vulnerability when ahead.
•Their game management needs work: 9 points dropped after taking the lead.
•Their game management is inconsistent: strong at comebacks but vulnerable when leading.
•They're selective but clinical, taking 9.6 shots per game with 42% accuracy.
•Their build-up is patient and slower-tempo (about 47 passes per shot).
•They're well-organized defensively (only 2.4 saves required per game).
•As a top-2 side facing another top-5 team, this represents a clash between quality opponents.