Comparing both teams this season
Style of play and derived stats from match data this season
Tap ? next to a stat for what it means.
Current league table
| # | Team | P | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 34 | +19 | 70 | |
| 2 | 34 | +25 | 62 | |
| 3 | 34 | +14 | 62 | |
| 4 | 34 | +16 | 60 | |
| 5 | 34 | +12 | 52 | |
| 6 | 34 | +5 | 52 | |
| 7 | 34 | +3 | 51 | |
| 8 | 34 | +2 | 46 | |
| 9 | 34 | +2 | 44 | |
| 10 | 34 | -11 | 44 | |
| 11 | 34 | +1 | 41 | |
| 12 | 34 | -4 | 41 | |
| 13 | 36 | -18 | 40 | |
| 14 | 34 | +2 | 39 | |
| 15 | 34 | -6 | 39 | |
| 16 | 34 | -18 | 37 | |
| 17 | 34 | -20 | 37 | |
| 18 | 34 | -23 | 30 | |
| 19 | 2 | -1 | 3 |
All Fixtures (42)
All Fixtures (43)
They maintain balanced possession (54%). They've proven effective without the ball, winning 7 games with less possession. However, they've lost 19 games despite having more possession, suggesting they struggle to convert dominance into results Additionally, Their game management needs work: 7 points dropped after taking the lead Meanwhile, Their attacking output is impressive: 15.4 shots per game, 5.3 finding the target. They move the ball forward with intent (around 29 passes per shot). As a lower-table side (15th), they'll need to be disciplined against a top-4 opponent.
They maintain balanced possession (54%)
Read full analysisThis team they maintain balanced possession (56%). Despite often having less possession, they've won 6 games, demonstrating tactical flexibility. A concerning pattern: they've lost 5 games with more possession, showing vulnerability when expected to create Additionally, They've lost 5 games despite having more possession, showing significant vulnerability when expected to control matches Meanwhile, They've shown strong resilience, winning 2 games after trailing at halftime. Their ability to recover is valuable: 12 points gained after falling behind. They've struggled to hold onto leads, losing 4 times after being ahead at halftime. They've dropped 23 points from winning positions, indicating issues closing out games Additionally, Their game management is inconsistent: strong at comebacks but vulnerable when leading Meanwhile, They prioritize getting into dangerous areas (9.8 shots inside the box per game). Their chance quality is strong, with 39% of shots hitting the target. They generate many corner opportunities (6.1 corners/game).
They maintain balanced possession (56%)
Read full analysis1. FC Magdeburg home games half time results
Hannover 96 away games half time results