Comparing both teams this season
Style of play and derived stats from match data this season
Tap ? next to a stat for what it means.
Current league table
| # | Team | P | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 36 | +23 | 66 | |
| 2 | 36 | +13 | 63 | |
| 3 | 36 | +11 | 59 | |
| 4 | 36 | +9 | 54 | |
| 5 | 36 | +10 | 52 | |
| 6 | 36 | 0 | 51 | |
| 7 | 37 | -18 | 42 | |
| 8 | 36 | -12 | 41 | |
| 9 | 36 | -7 | 39 | |
| 10 | 36 | -28 | 24 | |
| 11 | 1 | -1 | 0 |
All Fixtures (55)
All Fixtures (49)
This team they maintain balanced possession (57%) Additionally, Despite often having less possession, they've won 5 games, demonstrating tactical flexibility Meanwhile, A concerning pattern: they've lost 4 games with more possession, showing vulnerability when expected to create. They've lost 4 games despite having more possession, showing significant vulnerability when expected to control matches. They've shown strong resilience, winning 2 games after trailing at halftime. Their mental strength shows: 4 wins after conceding first Additionally, They've salvaged 19 points from losing positions this season Meanwhile, They've dropped 14 points from winning positions, indicating issues closing out games. While they take many shots (14.7/game), their accuracy is below par (28% on target). They generate volume but can be wasteful, with only 28% of attempts on target. As a top-3 side facing another top-1 team, this represents a clash between quality opponents.
They maintain balanced possession (57%)
Read full analysisA possession-oriented side averaging 60% possession. Despite often having less possession, they've won 3 games, demonstrating tactical flexibility. A concerning pattern: they've lost 7 games with more possession, showing vulnerability when expected to create. They've lost 7 games despite having more possession, showing significant vulnerability when expected to control matches Additionally, They've demonstrated resilience by winning 4 games after falling behind at some point Meanwhile, Their ability to recover is valuable: 16 points gained after falling behind. They've struggled to hold onto leads, losing 3 times after being ahead at halftime. They've dropped 11 points from winning positions, indicating issues closing out games. They're prolific chance creators, averaging 14.0 shots with 5.1 on target per game Additionally, They're well-organized defensively (only 2.1 saves required per game). As a top-1 side facing another top-3 team, this represents a clash between quality opponents.
a possession-oriented side averaging 60% possession
Read full analysisShelbourne home games half time results
Shamrock Rovers away games half time results
Last 4 meetings