Comparing both teams this season
Style of play and derived stats from match data this season
Tap ? next to a stat for what it means.
Current league table
| # | Team | P | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9 | +21 | 23 | |
| 2 | 9 | +14 | 22 | |
| 3 | 9 | +10 | 22 | |
| 4 | 9 | +5 | 18 | |
| 5 | 9 | +3 | 17 | |
| 6 | 9 | +4 | 13 | |
| 7 | 9 | 0 | 12 | |
| 8 | 9 | -3 | 12 | |
| 9 | 9 | -4 | 9 | |
| 10 | 9 | -7 | 9 | |
| 11 | 9 | -7 | 8 | |
| 12 | 9 | -13 | 6 | |
| 13 | 9 | -10 | 4 | |
| 14 | 9 | -13 | 3 |
All Fixtures (9)
All Fixtures (21)
They maintain balanced possession (48%) Additionally, However, they've lost 3 games despite having more possession, suggesting they struggle to convert dominance into results Meanwhile, A concerning pattern: they've lost 2 games despite leading at the break. They've struggled to protect leads, dropping 6 points from winning positions. They move the ball forward with intent (around 29 passes per shot). As a lower-table side (10th), they'll need to be disciplined against a top-3 opponent.
They maintain balanced possession (48%)
Read full analysisA possession-oriented side averaging 60% possession Meanwhile, They convert possession into results effectively, winning 86% of games when controlling the ball. Their comeback ability is notable: 2 wins after being behind at the break. They've salvaged 6 points from losing positions this season. They're mentally resilient, gaining significantly more points from losing positions than they drop from winning ones Additionally, They favor high-volume passing (569/game) but with a more direct approach (0% accuracy) Meanwhile, Their chance quality is strong, with 38% of shots hitting the target. Defensively, they're aggressive (14.0 fouls/game). A top-3 side facing a bottom-third opponent, they'll be expected to control this match.
a possession-oriented side averaging 60% possession
Read full analysisMaccabi Petah Tikva home games half time results
Hapoel Beer Sheva away games half time results