Comparing both teams this season
Style of play and derived stats from match data this season
Tap ? next to a stat for what it means.
Current league table
| # | Team | P | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 38 | +28 | 75 | |
| 2 | 38 | +25 | 70 | |
| 3 | 38 | +17 | 67 | |
| 4 | 38 | +23 | 63 | |
| 5 | 38 | -3 | 56 | |
| 6 | 38 | +11 | 55 | |
| 7 | 38 | +10 | 53 | |
| 8 | 38 | +8 | 53 | |
| 9 | 38 | -14 | 42 | |
| 10 | 38 | -23 | 38 | |
| 11 | 39 | -26 | 34 | |
| 12 | 38 | -56 | 23 | |
| 13 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
All Fixtures (53)
All Fixtures (46)
This team they maintain balanced possession (55%) Meanwhile, They've won 4 games despite having less possession, showing they're effective without the ball. They've dropped points in 10 games despite controlling possession, indicating issues breaking down defenses. They've lost 10 games despite having more possession, showing significant vulnerability when expected to control matches. They're capable of turning games around, winning 4 times after going behind Additionally, They've gained 15 points from losing positions, showing they fight until the end Meanwhile, A concerning pattern: they've lost 4 games despite leading at the break. They've struggled to protect leads, dropping 12 points from winning positions. In attack, they create numerous opportunities (15.2 shots/game, 5.6 on target). They move the ball forward with intent (around 29 passes per shot). As a top-5 side facing another top-2 team, this represents a clash between quality opponents.
They maintain balanced possession (55%)
Read full analysisThey maintain balanced possession (45%) Meanwhile, They've won 16 games despite having less possession, showing they're effective without the ball. They've dropped points in 4 games despite controlling possession, indicating issues breaking down defenses. They don't give up easily, having won 3 games despite trailing at halftime. They've demonstrated resilience by winning 6 games after falling behind at some point Additionally, Their ability to recover is valuable: 21 points gained after falling behind Meanwhile, They've struggled to hold onto leads, losing 5 times after being ahead at halftime. They've dropped 21 points from winning positions, indicating issues closing out games. Their game management is inconsistent: strong at comebacks but vulnerable when leading. They prefer direct play over possession, averaging 306 passes per game Additionally, They're prolific chance creators, averaging 15.9 shots with 5.5 on target per game Meanwhile, They prioritize getting into dangerous areas (11.4 shots inside the box per game). Defensively, they're aggressive (15.7 fouls/game). As a top-2 side facing another top-5 team, this represents a clash between quality opponents.
They maintain balanced possession (45%)
Read full analysisFC Basel 1893 home games half time results
FC ST. Gallen away games half time results
Last 4 meetings