Comparing both teams this season
Style of play and derived stats from match data this season
Tap ? next to a stat for what it means.
Current league table
| # | Team | P | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9 | +20 | 25 | |
| 2 | 9 | +13 | 19 | |
| 3 | 9 | +9 | 19 | |
| 4 | 9 | 0 | 13 | |
| 5 | 9 | -3 | 13 | |
| 6 | 9 | -1 | 12 | |
| 7 | 9 | -6 | 11 | |
| 8 | 9 | -2 | 10 | |
| 9 | 9 | -8 | 10 | |
| 10 | 9 | -11 | 8 | |
| 11 | 9 | -3 | 6 | |
| 12 | 9 | -8 | 6 |
All Fixtures (12)
All Fixtures (21)
They maintain balanced possession (44%) Meanwhile, They've struggled to protect leads, dropping 11 points from winning positions. They struggle to manage games effectively, dropping far more points from winning positions than they gain from losing ones. They prefer direct play over possession, averaging 343 passes per game. Defensively, they're aggressive (13.4 fouls/game). As a lower-table side (10th), they'll need to be disciplined against a top-1 opponent.
They maintain balanced possession (44%)
Read full analysisThey maintain balanced possession (57%). They've proven effective without the ball, winning 3 games with less possession. They convert possession into results effectively, winning 83% of games when controlling the ball Additionally, They've demonstrated resilience by winning 3 games after falling behind at some point Meanwhile, Their ability to recover is valuable: 10 points gained after falling behind. They're mentally resilient, gaining significantly more points from losing positions than they drop from winning ones. They favor high-volume passing (532/game) but with a more direct approach (38% accuracy). Their attacking output is impressive: 16.9 shots per game, 6.0 finding the target Additionally, They move the ball forward with intent (around 31 passes per shot). A top-1 side facing a bottom-third opponent, they'll be expected to control this match.
They maintain balanced possession (57%)
Read full analysisGrasshoppers home games half time results
FC Lugano away games half time results