Comparing both teams this season
Style of play and derived stats from match data this season
Tap ? next to a stat for what it means.
Current league table
| # | Team | P | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 32 | +30 | 67 | |
| 2 | 32 | +36 | 60 | |
| 3 | 32 | +23 | 51 | |
| 4 | 32 | +5 | 50 | |
| 5 | 32 | +9 | 45 | |
| 6 | 32 | -2 | 44 | |
| 7 | 32 | -5 | 44 | |
| 8 | 32 | -9 | 41 | |
| 9 | 32 | -26 | 36 | |
| 10 | 32 | -14 | 35 | |
| 11 | 32 | -23 | 34 | |
| 12 | 32 | -24 | 24 |
All Fixtures (40)
All Fixtures (36)
They maintain balanced possession (52%). They've proven effective without the ball, winning 4 games with less possession Additionally, However, they've lost 8 games despite having more possession, suggesting they struggle to convert dominance into results Meanwhile, Their comeback ability is notable: 3 wins after being behind at the break. They're capable of turning games around, winning 4 times after going behind. They've gained 14 points from losing positions, showing they fight until the end. A concerning pattern: they've lost 8 games despite leading at the break Additionally, They've struggled to protect leads, dropping 24 points from winning positions Meanwhile, Their game management is inconsistent: strong at comebacks but vulnerable when leading. Their chance quality is strong, with 39% of shots hitting the target. As a lower-table side (8th), they'll need to be disciplined against a top-4 opponent.
They maintain balanced possession (52%)
Read full analysisThey maintain balanced possession (57%). They've dropped points in 9 games despite controlling possession, indicating issues breaking down defenses. They've lost 9 games despite having more possession, showing significant vulnerability when expected to control matches Additionally, They don't give up easily, having won 3 games despite trailing at halftime Meanwhile, They've demonstrated resilience by winning 5 games after falling behind at some point. Their ability to recover is valuable: 16 points gained after falling behind. They've struggled to hold onto leads, losing 3 times after being ahead at halftime. They've dropped 15 points from winning positions, indicating issues closing out games Additionally, Their game management is inconsistent: strong at comebacks but vulnerable when leading Meanwhile, They build play through patient, accurate passing (588 passes/game, 87% success rate). Their chance quality is strong, with 42% of shots hitting the target. Positioned 4th, they're facing a team 4 places below them in the table.
They maintain balanced possession (57%)
Read full analysisOdense home games half time results
FC Nordsjaelland away games half time results