Comparing both teams this season
Style of play and derived stats from match data this season
Tap ? next to a stat for what it means.
Current league table
| # | Team | P | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 32 | +30 | 67 | |
| 2 | 32 | +36 | 60 | |
| 3 | 32 | +23 | 51 | |
| 4 | 32 | +5 | 50 | |
| 5 | 32 | +9 | 45 | |
| 6 | 32 | -2 | 44 | |
| 7 | 32 | -5 | 44 | |
| 8 | 32 | -9 | 41 | |
| 9 | 32 | -26 | 36 | |
| 10 | 32 | -14 | 35 | |
| 11 | 32 | -23 | 34 | |
| 12 | 32 | -24 | 24 |
All Fixtures (40)
All Fixtures (39)
They maintain balanced possession (52%). They've proven effective without the ball, winning 4 games with less possession Additionally, However, they've lost 8 games despite having more possession, suggesting they struggle to convert dominance into results Meanwhile, Their comeback ability is notable: 3 wins after being behind at the break. They're capable of turning games around, winning 4 times after going behind. They've gained 14 points from losing positions, showing they fight until the end. A concerning pattern: they've lost 8 games despite leading at the break Additionally, They've struggled to protect leads, dropping 24 points from winning positions Meanwhile, Their game management is inconsistent: strong at comebacks but vulnerable when leading. Their chance quality is strong, with 39% of shots hitting the target.
They maintain balanced possession (52%)
Read full analysisThis team they maintain balanced possession (48%) Meanwhile, Despite often having less possession, they've won 7 games, demonstrating tactical flexibility. A concerning pattern: they've lost 7 games with more possession, showing vulnerability when expected to create. They've dropped 15 points from winning positions, indicating issues closing out games. They prioritize getting into dangerous areas (8.9 shots inside the box per game).
They maintain balanced possession (48%)
Read full analysisOdense home games half time results
Randers FC away games half time results
Last 4 meetings