Comparing both teams this season
Style of play and derived stats from match data this season
Tap ? next to a stat for what it means.
Current league table
| # | Team | P | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 32 | +30 | 67 | |
| 2 | 32 | +36 | 60 | |
| 3 | 32 | +23 | 51 | |
| 4 | 32 | +5 | 50 | |
| 5 | 32 | +9 | 45 | |
| 6 | 32 | -2 | 44 | |
| 7 | 32 | -5 | 44 | |
| 8 | 32 | -9 | 41 | |
| 9 | 32 | -26 | 36 | |
| 10 | 32 | -14 | 35 | |
| 11 | 32 | -23 | 34 | |
| 12 | 32 | -24 | 24 |
All Fixtures (39)
All Fixtures (37)
This team they maintain balanced possession (48%) Meanwhile, Despite often having less possession, they've won 7 games, demonstrating tactical flexibility. A concerning pattern: they've lost 7 games with more possession, showing vulnerability when expected to create. They've dropped 15 points from winning positions, indicating issues closing out games. They prioritize getting into dangerous areas (8.9 shots inside the box per game).
They maintain balanced possession (48%)
Read full analysisThis team they maintain balanced possession (48%). Despite often having less possession, they've won 9 games, demonstrating tactical flexibility Additionally, A concerning pattern: they've lost 6 games with more possession, showing vulnerability when expected to create Meanwhile, They've demonstrated resilience by winning 3 games after falling behind at some point. Their ability to recover is valuable: 13 points gained after falling behind. They've struggled to hold onto leads, losing 2 times after being ahead at halftime. They've dropped 16 points from winning positions, indicating issues closing out games Additionally, They move the ball forward with intent (around 33 passes per shot). Positioned 6th, they're facing a team 4 places below them in the table.
They maintain balanced possession (48%)
Read full analysisRanders FC home games half time results
Viborg away games half time results