Comparing both teams this season
Style of play and derived stats from match data this season
Tap ? next to a stat for what it means.
Current league table
| # | Team | P | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 32 | +30 | 67 | |
| 2 | 32 | +36 | 60 | |
| 3 | 32 | +23 | 51 | |
| 4 | 32 | +5 | 50 | |
| 5 | 32 | +9 | 45 | |
| 6 | 32 | -2 | 44 | |
| 7 | 32 | -5 | 44 | |
| 8 | 32 | -9 | 41 | |
| 9 | 32 | -26 | 36 | |
| 10 | 32 | -14 | 35 | |
| 11 | 32 | -23 | 34 | |
| 12 | 32 | -24 | 24 |
All Fixtures (39)
All Fixtures (41)
This team they maintain balanced possession (48%) Meanwhile, Despite often having less possession, they've won 7 games, demonstrating tactical flexibility. A concerning pattern: they've lost 7 games with more possession, showing vulnerability when expected to create. They've dropped 15 points from winning positions, indicating issues closing out games. They prioritize getting into dangerous areas (8.9 shots inside the box per game).
They maintain balanced possession (48%)
Read full analysisThey maintain balanced possession (44%) Additionally, They've proven effective without the ball, winning 11 games with less possession Meanwhile, They've shown strong resilience, winning 2 games after trailing at halftime. Their mental strength shows: 4 wins after conceding first. They've salvaged 16 points from losing positions this season. However, they've blown 2 leads after leading at halftime, showing vulnerability when ahead Additionally, Their game management needs work: 7 points dropped after taking the lead Meanwhile, Their game management is inconsistent: strong at comebacks but vulnerable when leading. They move the ball forward with intent (around 32 passes per shot).
They maintain balanced possession (44%)
Read full analysisRanders FC home games half time results
Sonderjyske away games half time results