Comparing both teams this season
Style of play and derived stats from match data this season
Tap ? next to a stat for what it means.
Current league table
| # | Team | P | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 32 | +30 | 67 | |
| 2 | 32 | +36 | 60 | |
| 3 | 32 | +23 | 51 | |
| 4 | 32 | +5 | 50 | |
| 5 | 32 | +9 | 45 | |
| 6 | 32 | -2 | 44 | |
| 7 | 32 | -5 | 44 | |
| 8 | 32 | -9 | 41 | |
| 9 | 32 | -26 | 36 | |
| 10 | 32 | -14 | 35 | |
| 11 | 32 | -23 | 34 | |
| 12 | 32 | -24 | 24 |
All Fixtures (40)
All Fixtures (52)
They maintain balanced possession (52%). They've proven effective without the ball, winning 4 games with less possession Additionally, However, they've lost 8 games despite having more possession, suggesting they struggle to convert dominance into results Meanwhile, Their comeback ability is notable: 3 wins after being behind at the break. They're capable of turning games around, winning 4 times after going behind. They've gained 14 points from losing positions, showing they fight until the end. A concerning pattern: they've lost 8 games despite leading at the break Additionally, They've struggled to protect leads, dropping 24 points from winning positions Meanwhile, Their game management is inconsistent: strong at comebacks but vulnerable when leading. Their chance quality is strong, with 39% of shots hitting the target. As a lower-table side (8th), they'll need to be disciplined against a top-2 opponent.
They maintain balanced possession (52%)
Read full analysisThey maintain balanced possession (54%). Despite often having less possession, they've won 3 games, demonstrating tactical flexibility. A concerning pattern: they've lost 3 games with more possession, showing vulnerability when expected to create Additionally, They've demonstrated resilience by winning 4 games after falling behind at some point Meanwhile, Their ability to recover is valuable: 16 points gained after falling behind. They've struggled to hold onto leads, losing 4 times after being ahead at halftime. They've dropped 18 points from winning positions, indicating issues closing out games. They're prolific chance creators, averaging 14.0 shots with 5.6 on target per game Additionally, Their chance quality is strong, with 40% of shots hitting the target Meanwhile, They move the ball forward with intent (around 30 passes per shot). A top-2 side facing a bottom-third opponent, they'll be expected to control this match.
They maintain balanced possession (54%)
Read full analysisOdense home games half time results
FC Midtjylland away games half time results