Comparing both teams this season
Style of play and derived stats from match data this season
Tap ? next to a stat for what it means.
Current league table
| # | Team | P | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 19 | +20 | 40 | |
| 2 | 15 | +23 | 39 | |
| 3 | 14 | +21 | 35 | |
| 4 | 15 | +12 | 29 | |
| 5 | 13 | +6 | 25 | |
| 6 | 12 | +8 | 24 | |
| 7 | 15 | +7 | 24 | |
| 8 | 14 | +3 | 23 | |
| 9 | 10 | +11 | 22 | |
| 10 | 13 | +3 | 22 | |
| 11 | 12 | +7 | 21 | |
| 12 | 12 | 0 | 21 | |
| 13 | 14 | 0 | 21 | |
| 14 | 12 | +5 | 18 | |
| 15 | 14 | +2 | 18 | |
| 16 | 9 | +7 | 17 | |
| 17 | 9 | +2 | 17 | |
| 18 | 14 | 0 | 17 | |
| 19 | 12 | -1 | 17 | |
| 20 | 13 | +5 | 16 | |
| 21 | 9 | +5 | 15 | |
| 22 | 10 | +1 | 15 | |
| 23 | 6 | +1 | 13 | |
| 24 | 11 | -1 | 12 | |
| 25 | 7 | -1 | 10 |
All Fixtures (58)
All Fixtures (52)
This team they maintain balanced possession (53%). A concerning pattern: they've lost 3 games with more possession, showing vulnerability when expected to create. In attack, they create numerous opportunities (15.1 shots/game, 5.8 on target) Additionally, Their chance quality is strong, with 38% of shots hitting the target Meanwhile, They move the ball forward with intent (around 32 passes per shot). They're well-organized defensively (only 2.2 saves required per game). Positioned 7th, they're facing a team 4 places above them in the table.
They maintain balanced possession (53%)
Read full analysisA reactive side with 40% average possession Meanwhile, They've proven effective without the ball, winning 4 games with less possession. They prefer direct play over possession, averaging 242 passes per game. Their chance quality is strong, with 45% of shots hitting the target. Positioned 3rd, they're facing a team 4 places below them in the table.
a reactive side with 40% average possession
Read full analysisNottingham Forest home games half time results
FC Midtjylland away games half time results