Comparing both teams this season
Style of play and derived stats from match data this season
Tap ? next to a stat for what it means.
Current league table
| # | Team | P | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9 | +9 | 24 | |
| 2 | 9 | +10 | 21 | |
| 3 | 9 | +17 | 19 | |
| 4 | 9 | +4 | 16 | |
| 5 | 9 | +2 | 15 | |
| 6 | 9 | +7 | 14 | |
| 7 | 9 | 0 | 13 | |
| 8 | 9 | +1 | 12 | |
| 9 | 9 | 0 | 12 | |
| 10 | 9 | -3 | 12 | |
| 11 | 9 | +1 | 11 | |
| 12 | 9 | +1 | 11 | |
| 13 | 9 | -3 | 11 | |
| 14 | 9 | -4 | 11 | |
| 15 | 9 | -2 | 9 | |
| 16 | 9 | -7 | 9 | |
| 17 | 9 | -5 | 7 | |
| 18 | 9 | -12 | 7 | |
| 19 | 9 | -6 | 6 | |
| 20 | 9 | -10 | 5 |
All Fixtures (17)
All Fixtures (16)
A reactive side with 41% average possession. They've salvaged 6 points from losing positions this season. They prefer direct play over possession, averaging 348 passes per game. Their attacking output is modest (9.3 shots/game).
a reactive side with 41% average possession
Read full analysisThis team they maintain balanced possession (47%). A concerning pattern: they've lost 4 games with more possession, showing vulnerability when expected to create Additionally, They've dropped 7 points from winning positions, indicating issues closing out games Meanwhile, They struggle to manage games effectively, dropping far more points from winning positions than they gain from losing ones. While they take many shots (16.3/game), their accuracy is below par (21% on target). They generate volume but can be wasteful, with only 21% of attempts on target. Defensively, they're aggressive (13.7 fouls/game). They're well-organized defensively (only 1.8 saves required per game).
They maintain balanced possession (47%)
Read full analysisCrystal Palace home games half time results
Nottingham Forest away games half time results