Comparing both teams this season
Style of play and derived stats from match data this season
Tap ? next to a stat for what it means.
Current league table
| # | Team | P | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 25 | +38 | 59 | |
| 2 | 25 | +38 | 59 | |
| 3 | 25 | +20 | 43 | |
| 4 | 25 | +18 | 43 | |
| 5 | 25 | +3 | 42 | |
| 6 | 25 | +5 | 40 | |
| 7 | 25 | +3 | 32 | |
| 8 | 25 | -3 | 32 | |
| 9 | 25 | -7 | 31 | |
| 10 | 25 | -9 | 31 | |
| 11 | 25 | -15 | 29 | |
| 12 | 25 | -8 | 27 | |
| 13 | 25 | -18 | 27 | |
| 14 | 25 | -14 | 24 | |
| 15 | 25 | -22 | 23 | |
| 16 | 25 | -29 | 19 |
All Fixtures (32)
All Fixtures (37)
They maintain balanced possession (45%) Additionally, They've proven effective without the ball, winning 6 games with less possession Meanwhile, However, they've lost 3 games despite having more possession, suggesting they struggle to convert dominance into results. Their ability to recover is valuable: 7 points gained after falling behind. They've struggled to protect leads, dropping 10 points from winning positions.
They maintain balanced possession (45%)
Read full analysisThey maintain balanced possession (50%) Additionally, Despite often having less possession, they've won 6 games, demonstrating tactical flexibility Meanwhile, A concerning pattern: they've lost 3 games with more possession, showing vulnerability when expected to create. However, they've blown 3 leads after leading at halftime, showing vulnerability when ahead. Their game management needs work: 8 points dropped after taking the lead. They prioritize getting into dangerous areas (8.9 shots inside the box per game) Additionally, Their chance quality is strong, with 40% of shots hitting the target Meanwhile, They're well-organized defensively (only 2.3 saves required per game). Positioned 6th, they're facing a team 4 places below them in the table.
They maintain balanced possession (50%)
Read full analysisKFUM Oslo home games half time results
Tromso away games half time results