Comparing both teams this season
Style of play and derived stats from match data this season
Tap ? next to a stat for what it means.
Current league table
| # | Team | P | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 16 | +30 | 38 | |
| 2 | 14 | +20 | 34 | |
| 3 | 15 | +11 | 31 | |
| 4 | 15 | +4 | 25 | |
| 5 | 14 | +6 | 23 | |
| 6 | 14 | -1 | 21 | |
| 7 | 15 | -3 | 21 | |
| 8 | 15 | -5 | 20 | |
| 9 | 15 | +5 | 19 | |
| 10 | 14 | +1 | 18 | |
| 11 | 15 | -11 | 17 | |
| 12 | 15 | -8 | 15 | |
| 13 | 14 | -10 | 13 | |
| 14 | 14 | -10 | 12 | |
| 15 | 14 | -11 | 12 | |
| 16 | 15 | -18 | 10 |
All Fixtures (24)
All Fixtures (23)
A counter-attacking team with 41% average possession Additionally, A concerning pattern: they've lost 3 games despite leading at the break Meanwhile, They've struggled to protect leads, dropping 16 points from winning positions. They prefer direct play over possession, averaging 341 passes per game. They're well-organized defensively (only 2.5 saves required per game). Despite decent shot volume, they produce limited corner pressure (3.4 corners/game). As a lower-table side (16th), they'll need to be disciplined against a top-3 opponent.
a counter-attacking team with 41% average possession
Read full analysisThis team they maintain balanced possession (50%). Despite often having less possession, they've won 5 games, demonstrating tactical flexibility. They've struggled to hold onto leads, losing 2 times after being ahead at halftime. They've dropped 4 points from winning positions, indicating issues closing out games Additionally, They prioritize getting into dangerous areas (9.1 shots inside the box per game) Meanwhile, Their chance quality is strong, with 41% of shots hitting the target. They're well-organized defensively (only 2.3 saves required per game). A top-3 side facing a bottom-third opponent, they'll be expected to control this match.
They maintain balanced possession (50%)
Read full analysisStart home games half time results
Tromso away games half time results