Comparing both teams this season
Style of play and derived stats from match data this season
Tap ? next to a stat for what it means.
Current league table
| # | Team | P | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 20 | +35 | 50 | |
| 2 | 21 | +34 | 50 | |
| 3 | 21 | +11 | 38 | |
| 4 | 21 | +12 | 36 | |
| 5 | 21 | +9 | 33 | |
| 6 | 21 | -1 | 32 | |
| 7 | 21 | -7 | 28 | |
| 8 | 20 | +6 | 26 | |
| 9 | 21 | -5 | 25 | |
| 10 | 21 | -10 | 25 | |
| 11 | 21 | -6 | 23 | |
| 12 | 21 | -9 | 23 | |
| 13 | 21 | -15 | 23 | |
| 14 | 21 | -13 | 21 | |
| 15 | 21 | -19 | 19 | |
| 16 | 21 | -22 | 16 |
All Fixtures (30)
All Fixtures (33)
A team that prefers to sit back with 42% average possession. They've won 3 games despite having less possession, showing they're effective without the ball. A concerning pattern: they've lost 3 games despite leading at the break. They've struggled to protect leads, dropping 16 points from winning positions Additionally, They generate volume but can be wasteful, with only 27% of attempts on target. As a lower-table side (16th), they'll need to be disciplined against a top-3 opponent.
a team that prefers to sit back with 42% average possession
Read full analysisThey maintain balanced possession (51%) Meanwhile, They've won 6 games despite having less possession, showing they're effective without the ball. A concerning pattern: they've lost 2 games despite leading at the break. They've struggled to protect leads, dropping 4 points from winning positions. They prioritize getting into dangerous areas (9.0 shots inside the box per game) Additionally, Their chance quality is strong, with 44% of shots hitting the target Meanwhile, They're well-organized defensively (only 2.2 saves required per game). A top-3 side facing a bottom-third opponent, they'll be expected to control this match.
They maintain balanced possession (51%)
Read full analysisStart home games half time results
Tromso away games half time results