Comparing both teams this season
Style of play and derived stats from match data this season
Tap ? next to a stat for what it means.
Current league table
| # | Team | P | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 20 | +35 | 50 | |
| 2 | 20 | +31 | 47 | |
| 3 | 21 | +12 | 36 | |
| 4 | 20 | +10 | 35 | |
| 5 | 21 | +9 | 33 | |
| 6 | 20 | +2 | 32 | |
| 7 | 20 | -7 | 27 | |
| 8 | 20 | +6 | 26 | |
| 9 | 21 | -5 | 25 | |
| 10 | 21 | -10 | 25 | |
| 11 | 20 | -14 | 23 | |
| 12 | 20 | -9 | 22 | |
| 13 | 21 | -13 | 21 | |
| 14 | 20 | -9 | 20 | |
| 15 | 21 | -19 | 19 | |
| 16 | 20 | -19 | 16 |
All Fixtures (29)
All Fixtures (29)
This team a counter-attacking team with 42% average possession Meanwhile, Despite often having less possession, they've won 3 games, demonstrating tactical flexibility. They've struggled to hold onto leads, losing 3 times after being ahead at halftime. They've dropped 16 points from winning positions, indicating issues closing out games. While they take many shots (14.2/game), their accuracy is below par (27% on target) Additionally, They generate volume but can be wasteful, with only 27% of attempts on target. As a lower-table side (16th), they'll need to be disciplined against a top-5 opponent.
a counter-attacking team with 42% average possession
Read full analysisThey maintain balanced possession (53%). A concerning pattern: they've lost 4 games with more possession, showing vulnerability when expected to create Additionally, They've gained 7 points from losing positions, showing they fight until the end Meanwhile, Their game management needs work: 13 points dropped after taking the lead. They generate many corner opportunities (6.0 corners/game).
They maintain balanced possession (53%)
Read full analysisStart home games half time results
Rosenborg away games half time results