Comparing both teams this season
Style of play and derived stats from match data this season
Tap ? next to a stat for what it means.
Current league table
| # | Team | P | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 14 | +23 | 38 | |
| 2 | 15 | +18 | 27 | |
| 3 | 15 | +5 | 25 | |
| 4 | 13 | +12 | 23 | |
| 5 | 14 | +1 | 22 | |
| 6 | 14 | 0 | 22 | |
| 7 | 15 | +2 | 21 | |
| 8 | 14 | +4 | 20 | |
| 9 | 15 | +4 | 20 | |
| 10 | 15 | -2 | 18 | |
| 11 | 14 | +1 | 17 | |
| 12 | 14 | -3 | 17 | |
| 13 | 14 | -16 | 13 | |
| 14 | 14 | -12 | 10 | |
| 15 | 14 | -19 | 10 | |
| 16 | 14 | -18 | 7 |
All Fixtures (23)
All Fixtures (20)
This team they maintain balanced possession (52%). Despite often having less possession, they've won 3 games, demonstrating tactical flexibility. A concerning pattern: they've lost 4 games with more possession, showing vulnerability when expected to create Additionally, They've gained 8 points from losing positions, showing they fight until the end Meanwhile, They're mentally resilient, gaining significantly more points from losing positions than they drop from winning ones. Positioned 6th, they're facing a team 5 places above them in the table.
They maintain balanced possession (52%)
Read full analysisThey maintain balanced possession (47%). They've won 7 games despite having less possession, showing they're effective without the ball. Their ability to recover is valuable: 7 points gained after falling behind. They're mentally resilient, gaining significantly more points from losing positions than they drop from winning ones Additionally, Their attacking output is impressive: 14.1 shots per game, 5.9 finding the target Meanwhile, Their chance quality is strong, with 42% of shots hitting the target. They move the ball forward with intent (around 28 passes per shot). Positioned 1st, they're facing a team 5 places below them in the table.
They maintain balanced possession (47%)
Read full analysisAIK Stockholm home games half time results
Sirius away games half time results