Comparing both teams this season
Style of play and derived stats from match data this season
Tap ? next to a stat for what it means.
Current league table
| # | Team | P | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 24 | +25 | 55 | |
| 2 | 24 | +29 | 47 | |
| 3 | 24 | +29 | 46 | |
| 4 | 24 | +13 | 42 | |
| 5 | 24 | +13 | 41 | |
| 6 | 24 | -1 | 38 | |
| 7 | 24 | +4 | 36 | |
| 8 | 24 | -9 | 36 | |
| 9 | 24 | -4 | 34 | |
| 10 | 24 | +5 | 30 | |
| 11 | 24 | -7 | 30 | |
| 12 | 24 | -12 | 23 | |
| 13 | 24 | -15 | 22 | |
| 14 | 24 | -16 | 20 | |
| 15 | 24 | -25 | 18 | |
| 16 | 24 | -29 | 14 |
All Fixtures (34)
All Fixtures (33)
A reactive side with 41% average possession. A concerning pattern: they've lost 3 games with more possession, showing vulnerability when expected to create. However, they've blown 2 leads after leading at halftime, showing vulnerability when ahead Additionally, Their game management needs work: 12 points dropped after taking the lead. They struggle to manage games effectively, dropping far more points from winning positions than they gain from losing ones.
a reactive side with 41% average possession
Read full analysisThey maintain balanced possession (54%). They've won 5 games despite having less possession, showing they're effective without the ball. They've dropped points in 8 games despite controlling possession, indicating issues breaking down defenses. They don't give up easily, having won 2 games despite trailing at halftime Additionally, They've demonstrated resilience by winning 4 games after falling behind at some point Meanwhile, Their ability to recover is valuable: 16 points gained after falling behind. They've struggled to protect leads, dropping 5 points from winning positions.
They maintain balanced possession (54%)
Read full analysisHalmstad home games half time results
AIK Stockholm away games half time results