Strandvallen, Hallevik
Mjallby AIF
2-0
HT: 0 - 0
FULL TIME
Comparing both teams this season
Style of play and derived stats from match data this season
Tap ? next to a stat for what it means.
Current league table
| # | Team | P | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 24 | +25 | 55 | |
| 2 | 24 | +29 | 47 | |
| 3 | 24 | +29 | 46 | |
| 4 | 24 | +13 | 42 | |
| 5 | 24 | +13 | 41 | |
| 6 | 24 | -1 | 38 | |
| 7 | 24 | +4 | 36 | |
| 8 | 24 | -9 | 36 | |
| 9 | 24 | -4 | 34 | |
| 10 | 24 | +5 | 30 | |
| 11 | 24 | -7 | 30 | |
| 12 | 24 | -12 | 23 | |
| 13 | 24 | -15 | 22 | |
| 14 | 24 | -16 | 20 | |
| 15 | 24 | -25 | 18 | |
| 16 | 24 | -29 | 14 |
All Fixtures (39)
All Fixtures (34)
They maintain balanced possession (51%) Additionally, A concerning pattern: they've lost 5 games with more possession, showing vulnerability when expected to create Meanwhile, They've gained 7 points from losing positions, showing they fight until the end. Their game management needs work: 7 points dropped after taking the lead. Their chance quality is strong, with 38% of shots hitting the target. Defensively, they're aggressive (13.2 fouls/game).
They maintain balanced possession (51%)
Read full analysisA reactive side with 41% average possession. A concerning pattern: they've lost 3 games with more possession, showing vulnerability when expected to create. However, they've blown 2 leads after leading at halftime, showing vulnerability when ahead Additionally, Their game management needs work: 12 points dropped after taking the lead. They struggle to manage games effectively, dropping far more points from winning positions than they gain from losing ones.
a reactive side with 41% average possession
Read full analysisMjallby AIF home games half time results
Halmstad away games half time results
