Comparing both teams this season
Style of play and derived stats from match data this season
Tap ? next to a stat for what it means.
Current league table
| # | Team | P | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 24 | +25 | 55 | |
| 2 | 24 | +29 | 47 | |
| 3 | 24 | +29 | 46 | |
| 4 | 24 | +13 | 42 | |
| 5 | 24 | +13 | 41 | |
| 6 | 24 | -1 | 38 | |
| 7 | 24 | +4 | 36 | |
| 8 | 24 | -9 | 36 | |
| 9 | 24 | -4 | 34 | |
| 10 | 24 | +5 | 30 | |
| 11 | 24 | -7 | 30 | |
| 12 | 24 | -12 | 23 | |
| 13 | 24 | -15 | 22 | |
| 14 | 24 | -16 | 20 | |
| 15 | 24 | -25 | 18 | |
| 16 | 24 | -29 | 14 |
All Fixtures (36)
All Fixtures (34)
This team they maintain balanced possession (51%). They've won 4 games despite having less possession, showing they're effective without the ball. They've dropped points in 5 games despite controlling possession, indicating issues breaking down defenses Additionally, They've salvaged 6 points from losing positions this season Meanwhile, They've dropped 11 points from winning positions, indicating issues closing out games. They move the ball forward with intent (around 27 passes per shot). They're well-organized defensively (only 2.5 saves required per game). They generate many corner opportunities (6.6 corners/game).
They maintain balanced possession (51%)
Read full analysisA reactive side with 41% average possession. A concerning pattern: they've lost 3 games with more possession, showing vulnerability when expected to create. However, they've blown 2 leads after leading at halftime, showing vulnerability when ahead Additionally, Their game management needs work: 12 points dropped after taking the lead. They struggle to manage games effectively, dropping far more points from winning positions than they gain from losing ones.
a reactive side with 41% average possession
Read full analysisIFK Goteborg home games half time results
Halmstad away games half time results