Comparing both teams this season
Style of play and derived stats from match data this season
Tap ? next to a stat for what it means.
Current league table
| # | Team | P | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 22 | +24 | 51 | |
| 2 | 22 | +29 | 43 | |
| 3 | 22 | +26 | 41 | |
| 4 | 22 | +9 | 37 | |
| 5 | 22 | +9 | 36 | |
| 6 | 22 | -1 | 35 | |
| 7 | 22 | +4 | 33 | |
| 8 | 22 | -3 | 33 | |
| 9 | 22 | -10 | 32 | |
| 10 | 22 | +8 | 30 | |
| 11 | 22 | -6 | 27 | |
| 12 | 22 | -11 | 22 | |
| 13 | 22 | -15 | 19 | |
| 14 | 22 | -15 | 19 | |
| 15 | 22 | -24 | 15 | |
| 16 | 22 | -24 | 14 |
All Fixtures (31)
All Fixtures (32)
They maintain balanced possession (54%). They've proven effective without the ball, winning 5 games with less possession Additionally, However, they've lost 7 games despite having more possession, suggesting they struggle to convert dominance into results Meanwhile, Their comeback ability is notable: 2 wins after being behind at the break. They're capable of turning games around, winning 4 times after going behind. They've gained 15 points from losing positions, showing they fight until the end. Their game management needs work: 5 points dropped after taking the lead.
They maintain balanced possession (54%)
Read full analysisA reactive side with 42% average possession. A concerning pattern: they've lost 3 games with more possession, showing vulnerability when expected to create. However, they've blown 2 leads after leading at halftime, showing vulnerability when ahead Additionally, Their game management needs work: 12 points dropped after taking the lead. They struggle to manage games effectively, dropping far more points from winning positions than they gain from losing ones.
a reactive side with 42% average possession
Read full analysisAIK Stockholm home games half time results
Halmstad away games half time results