Comparing both teams this season
Current league table
| # | Team | P | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 34 | +42 | 81 | |
| 2 | 35 | +15 | 66 | |
| 3 | 35 | 0 |
All Fixtures (38)
Style of play and derived stats from match data this season
Tap ? next to a stat for what it means.
| 54 |
| 4 | 35 | +21 | 53 |
| 5 | 35 | +6 | 53 |
| 6 | 35 | +4 | 51 |
| 7 | 34 | +7 | 48 |
| 8 | 35 | -5 | 47 |
| 9 | 35 | -1 | 46 |
| 10 | 35 | -11 | 44 |
| 11 | 35 | -12 | 42 |
| 12 | 35 | -8 | 40 |
| 13 | 35 | -8 | 39 |
| 14 | 35 | -11 | 38 |
| 15 | 35 | -13 | 37 |
| 16 | 35 | -26 | 30 |
All Fixtures (37)
This team they maintain balanced possession (52%) Additionally, They've won 4 games despite having less possession, showing they're effective without the ball Meanwhile, They've dropped points in 3 games despite controlling possession, indicating issues breaking down defenses. They don't give up easily, having won 4 games despite trailing at halftime. They've demonstrated resilience by winning 5 games after falling behind at some point. Their ability to recover is valuable: 17 points gained after falling behind Additionally, They've struggled to hold onto leads, losing 2 times after being ahead at halftime Meanwhile, They've dropped 10 points from winning positions, indicating issues closing out games. Their game management is inconsistent: strong at comebacks but vulnerable when leading. They generate volume but can be wasteful, with only 25% of attempts on target. Defensively, they're aggressive (13.1 fouls/game) Additionally, They're well-organized defensively (only 2.4 saves required per game). As a top-5 side facing another top-3 team, this represents a clash between quality opponents.
They maintain balanced possession (52%)
Read full analysisThey maintain balanced possession (51%). Despite often having less possession, they've won 5 games, demonstrating tactical flexibility. A concerning pattern: they've lost 5 games with more possession, showing vulnerability when expected to create. However, they've blown 3 leads after leading at halftime, showing vulnerability when ahead Additionally, Their game management needs work: 15 points dropped after taking the lead. As a top-3 side facing another top-5 team, this represents a clash between quality opponents.
They maintain balanced possession (51%)
Read full analysisLDU de Quito home games half time results
Aucas away games half time results
Last 3 meetings