Comparing both teams this season
Current league table
| # | Team | P | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 30 | +40 | 74 | |
| 2 | 31 | +9 | 54 | |
| 3 | 30 | +24 |
All Fixtures (31)
Style of play and derived stats from match data this season
Tap ? next to a stat for what it means.
| 51 |
| 4 | 31 | +4 | 50 |
| 5 | 30 | +7 | 46 |
| 6 | 30 | +7 | 44 |
| 7 | 31 | 0 | 44 |
| 8 | 31 | -1 | 40 |
| 9 | 31 | -3 | 40 |
| 10 | 31 | -10 | 39 |
| 11 | 30 | -3 | 38 |
| 12 | 30 | -12 | 36 |
| 13 | 30 | -11 | 33 |
| 14 | 31 | -14 | 33 |
| 15 | 31 | -12 | 29 |
| 16 | 30 | -25 | 21 |
All Fixtures (33)
A counter-attacking team with 41% average possession Additionally, Despite often having less possession, they've won 8 games, demonstrating tactical flexibility Meanwhile, They don't give up easily, having won 2 games despite trailing at halftime. They've gained 10 points from losing positions, showing they fight until the end. A concerning pattern: they've lost 3 games despite leading at the break. They've struggled to protect leads, dropping 10 points from winning positions Additionally, Their game management is inconsistent: strong at comebacks but vulnerable when leading Meanwhile, They prefer direct play over possession, averaging 288 passes per game. Their chance quality is strong, with 38% of shots hitting the target. Positioned 7th, they're facing a team 2 places above them in the table.
a counter-attacking team with 41% average possession
Read full analysisThis team they maintain balanced possession (50%). Despite often having less possession, they've won 4 games, demonstrating tactical flexibility. They don't give up easily, having won 2 games despite trailing at halftime Additionally, They've demonstrated resilience by winning 3 games after falling behind at some point Meanwhile, Their ability to recover is valuable: 10 points gained after falling behind. They've struggled to hold onto leads, losing 2 times after being ahead at halftime. They've dropped 10 points from winning positions, indicating issues closing out games. Their game management is inconsistent: strong at comebacks but vulnerable when leading Additionally, They generate volume but can be wasteful, with only 24% of attempts on target Meanwhile, Defensively, they're aggressive (14.3 fouls/game). They're well-organized defensively (only 2.2 saves required per game). As a top-5 side facing another top-7 team, this represents a clash between quality opponents.
They maintain balanced possession (50%)
Read full analysisLibertad home games half time results
LDU de Quito away games half time results