Predictions for this day Calendar

Estadio Rodrigo Paz Delgado, Quito

LDU de Quito

VS

Not Started

Aucas

LDU de Quito vs Aucas predictions & stats

Top pick LDU de Quito 40%, Over 2.5 goals 39%. Free match analysis, team stats and betting tips for Liga Pro.

Liga Pro Standings

Current league table

#	Team	P	GD	Pts
1	Independiente del Valle	34	+42	81
2	Macara	35	+15	66
3	Aucas	35	0	54
4	Universidad Catolica	35	+21	53
5	LDU de Quito	35	+6	53
6	Libertad	35	+4	51
7	Barcelona SC	34	+7	48
8	Guayaquil City FC	35	-5	47
9	Leones del Norte	35	-1	46
10	Deportivo Cuenca	35	-11	44
11	Emelec	35	-12	42
12	Mushuc Runa SC	35	-8	40
13	Orense SC	35	-8	39
14	Delfin SC	35	-11	38
15	Tecnico Universitario	35	-13	37
16	Manta FC	35	-26	30

Playing Style Analysis

LDU de Quito

This team they maintain balanced possession (52%) Additionally, They've won 4 games despite having less possession, showing they're effective without the ball Meanwhile, They've dropped points in 3 games despite controlling possession, indicating issues breaking down defenses. They don't give up easily, having won 4 games despite trailing at halftime. They've demonstrated resilience by winning 5 games after falling behind at some point. Their ability to recover is valuable: 17 points gained after falling behind Additionally, They've struggled to hold onto leads, losing 2 times after being ahead at halftime Meanwhile, They've dropped 10 points from winning positions, indicating issues closing out games. Their game management is inconsistent: strong at comebacks but vulnerable when leading. They generate volume but can be wasteful, with only 25% of attempts on target. Defensively, they're aggressive (13.1 fouls/game) Additionally, They're well-organized defensively (only 2.4 saves required per game). As a top-5 side facing another top-3 team, this represents a clash between quality opponents.

LDU de Quito

They maintain balanced possession (52%)

Read full analysis

•They maintain balanced possession (52%).
•They've won 4 games despite having less possession, showing they're effective without the ball.
•They've dropped points in 3 games despite controlling possession, indicating issues breaking down defenses.
•They don't give up easily, having won 4 games despite trailing at halftime.
•They've demonstrated resilience by winning 5 games after falling behind at some point.
•Their ability to recover is valuable: 17 points gained after falling behind.
•They've struggled to hold onto leads, losing 2 times after being ahead at halftime.
•They've dropped 10 points from winning positions, indicating issues closing out games.
•Their game management is inconsistent: strong at comebacks but vulnerable when leading.
•They generate volume but can be wasteful, with only 25% of attempts on target.
•Defensively, they're aggressive (13.1 fouls/game).
•They're well-organized defensively (only 2.4 saves required per game).
•As a top-5 side facing another top-3 team, this represents a clash between quality opponents.

Aucas

They maintain balanced possession (51%). Despite often having less possession, they've won 5 games, demonstrating tactical flexibility. A concerning pattern: they've lost 5 games with more possession, showing vulnerability when expected to create. However, they've blown 3 leads after leading at halftime, showing vulnerability when ahead Additionally, Their game management needs work: 15 points dropped after taking the lead. As a top-3 side facing another top-5 team, this represents a clash between quality opponents.

Aucas

They maintain balanced possession (51%)

Read full analysis

•They maintain balanced possession (51%).
•Despite often having less possession, they've won 5 games, demonstrating tactical flexibility.
•A concerning pattern: they've lost 5 games with more possession, showing vulnerability when expected to create.
•However, they've blown 3 leads after leading at halftime, showing vulnerability when ahead.
•Their game management needs work: 15 points dropped after taking the lead.
•As a top-3 side facing another top-5 team, this represents a clash between quality opponents.