Comparing both teams this season
Current league table
| # | Team | P | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 32 | +51 | 88 | |
| 2 | 31 | +23 | 64 | |
| 3 | 32 | +21 |
All Fixtures (37)
Style of play and derived stats from match data this season
Tap ? next to a stat for what it means.
| 64 |
| 4 | 32 | +13 | 53 |
| 5 | 32 | +5 | 53 |
| 6 | 32 | +4 | 51 |
| 7 | 32 | +8 | 47 |
| 8 | 32 | +3 | 42 |
| 9 | 32 | -9 | 41 |
| 10 | 32 | -7 | 38 |
| 11 | 32 | -4 | 36 |
| 12 | 31 | -4 | 35 |
| 13 | 32 | -14 | 35 |
| 14 | 32 | -9 | 31 |
| 15 | 32 | -17 | 31 |
| 16 | 32 | -22 | 21 |
| 17 | 32 | -42 | 16 |
All Fixtures (38)
This team a side that controls possession averaging 58% possession. However, they've lost 8 games despite having more possession, suggesting they struggle to convert dominance into results. They've lost 8 games despite having more possession, showing significant vulnerability when expected to control matches. A concerning pattern: they've lost 3 games despite leading at the break Additionally, They've struggled to protect leads, dropping 13 points from winning positions Meanwhile, Their passing game is both expansive and precise (517 passes/game at 85% accuracy). As a lower-table side (16th), they'll need to be disciplined against a top-6 opponent.
a side that controls possession averaging 58% possession
Read full analysisA reactive side with 37% average possession. They've proven effective without the ball, winning 8 games with less possession. They've shown strong resilience, winning 2 games after trailing at halftime Additionally, Their mental strength shows: 5 wins after conceding first Meanwhile, They've salvaged 17 points from losing positions this season. However, they've blown 3 leads after leading at halftime, showing vulnerability when ahead. Their game management needs work: 11 points dropped after taking the lead. Their game management is inconsistent: strong at comebacks but vulnerable when leading Additionally, They prefer direct play over possession, averaging 253 passes per game Meanwhile, Their attacking output is impressive: 16.5 shots per game, 5.5 finding the target. Defensively, they're aggressive (15.7 fouls/game). They're well-organized defensively (only 1.6 saves required per game).
a reactive side with 37% average possession
Read full analysisClub Brugge II home games half time results
Patro Eisden away games half time results