A quick view of what other users on Beathem are leaning toward in each market.
Comparing both teams this season
Style of play and derived stats from match data this season
Tap ? next to a stat for what it means.
Current league table
| # | Team | P | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 32 | +51 | 88 | |
| 2 | 31 | +23 | 64 | |
| 3 | 32 | +21 | 64 | |
| 4 | 32 | +13 | 53 | |
| 5 | 32 | +5 | 53 | |
| 6 | 32 | +4 | 51 | |
| 7 | 32 | +8 | 47 | |
| 8 | 32 | +3 | 42 | |
| 9 | 32 | -9 | 41 | |
| 10 | 32 | -7 | 38 | |
| 11 | 32 | -4 | 36 | |
| 12 | 31 | -4 | 35 | |
| 13 | 32 | -14 | 35 | |
| 14 | 32 | -9 | 31 | |
| 15 | 32 | -17 | 31 | |
| 16 | 32 | -22 | 21 | |
| 17 | 32 | -42 | 16 |
All Fixtures (34)
All Fixtures (38)
They maintain balanced possession (57%) Additionally, They've dropped points in 8 games despite controlling possession, indicating issues breaking down defenses Meanwhile, They've lost 8 games despite having more possession, showing significant vulnerability when expected to control matches. They're capable of turning games around, winning 3 times after going behind. They've gained 9 points from losing positions, showing they fight until the end. A concerning pattern: they've lost 3 games despite leading at the break Additionally, They've struggled to protect leads, dropping 18 points from winning positions. Positioned 9th, they're facing a team 3 places above them in the table.
They maintain balanced possession (57%)
Read full analysisA reactive side with 37% average possession. They've proven effective without the ball, winning 8 games with less possession. They've shown strong resilience, winning 2 games after trailing at halftime Additionally, Their mental strength shows: 5 wins after conceding first Meanwhile, They've salvaged 17 points from losing positions this season. However, they've blown 3 leads after leading at halftime, showing vulnerability when ahead. Their game management needs work: 11 points dropped after taking the lead. Their game management is inconsistent: strong at comebacks but vulnerable when leading Additionally, They prefer direct play over possession, averaging 253 passes per game Meanwhile, Their attacking output is impressive: 16.5 shots per game, 5.5 finding the target. Defensively, they're aggressive (15.7 fouls/game). They're well-organized defensively (only 1.6 saves required per game). As a top-6 side facing another top-9 team, this represents a clash between quality opponents.
a reactive side with 37% average possession
Read full analysisKAA Gent II home games half time results
Patro Eisden away games half time results