Comparing both teams this season
Style of play and derived stats from match data this season
Tap ? next to a stat for what it means.
Current league table
| # | Team | P | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 32 | +51 | 88 | |
| 2 | 31 | +23 | 64 | |
| 3 | 32 | +21 | 64 | |
| 4 | 32 | +13 | 53 | |
| 5 | 32 | +5 | 53 | |
| 6 | 32 | +4 | 51 | |
| 7 | 32 | +8 | 47 | |
| 8 | 32 | +3 | 42 | |
| 9 | 32 | -9 | 41 | |
| 10 | 32 | -7 | 38 | |
| 11 | 32 | -4 | 36 | |
| 12 | 31 | -4 | 35 | |
| 13 | 32 | -14 | 35 | |
| 14 | 32 | -9 | 31 | |
| 15 | 32 | -17 | 31 | |
| 16 | 32 | -22 | 21 | |
| 17 | 32 | -42 | 16 |
All Fixtures (37)
All Fixtures (38)
They maintain balanced possession (53%). They've won 4 games despite having less possession, showing they're effective without the ball Additionally, They've dropped points in 4 games despite controlling possession, indicating issues breaking down defenses Meanwhile, They're capable of turning games around, winning 4 times after going behind. They've gained 13 points from losing positions, showing they fight until the end. Their game management needs work: 4 points dropped after taking the lead. They prioritize getting into dangerous areas (9.9 shots inside the box per game) Additionally, Their chance quality is strong, with 41% of shots hitting the target Meanwhile, They move the ball forward with intent (around 31 passes per shot). Defensively, they're aggressive (14.0 fouls/game). They generate many corner opportunities (6.5 corners/game). Positioned 2nd, they're facing a team 4 places below them in the table.
They maintain balanced possession (53%)
Read full analysisA reactive side with 37% average possession. They've proven effective without the ball, winning 8 games with less possession. They've shown strong resilience, winning 2 games after trailing at halftime Additionally, Their mental strength shows: 5 wins after conceding first Meanwhile, They've salvaged 17 points from losing positions this season. However, they've blown 3 leads after leading at halftime, showing vulnerability when ahead. Their game management needs work: 11 points dropped after taking the lead. Their game management is inconsistent: strong at comebacks but vulnerable when leading Additionally, They prefer direct play over possession, averaging 253 passes per game Meanwhile, Their attacking output is impressive: 16.5 shots per game, 5.5 finding the target. Defensively, they're aggressive (15.7 fouls/game). They're well-organized defensively (only 1.6 saves required per game). Positioned 6th, they're facing a team 4 places above them in the table.
a reactive side with 37% average possession
Read full analysisKortrijk home games half time results
Patro Eisden away games half time results