Comparing both teams this season
Style of play and derived stats from match data this season
Tap ? next to a stat for what it means.
Current league table
| # | Team | P | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 32 | +51 | 88 | |
| 2 | 31 | +23 | 64 | |
| 3 | 32 | +21 | 64 | |
| 4 | 32 | +13 | 53 | |
| 5 | 32 | +5 | 53 | |
| 6 | 32 | +4 | 51 | |
| 7 | 32 | +8 | 47 | |
| 8 | 32 | +3 | 42 | |
| 9 | 32 | -9 | 41 | |
| 10 | 32 | -7 | 38 | |
| 11 | 32 | -4 | 36 | |
| 12 | 31 | -4 | 35 | |
| 13 | 32 | -14 | 35 | |
| 14 | 32 | -9 | 31 | |
| 15 | 32 | -17 | 31 | |
| 16 | 32 | -22 | 21 | |
| 17 | 32 | -42 | 16 |
All Fixtures (32)
All Fixtures (38)
This team they maintain balanced possession (49%). They've won 4 games despite having less possession, showing they're effective without the ball. They've dropped points in 4 games despite controlling possession, indicating issues breaking down defenses Additionally, They've struggled to hold onto leads, losing 4 times after being ahead at halftime Meanwhile, They've dropped 25 points from winning positions, indicating issues closing out games. They move the ball forward with intent (around 31 passes per shot). Despite decent shot volume, they produce limited corner pressure (3.5 corners/game).
They maintain balanced possession (49%)
Read full analysisA reactive side with 37% average possession. They've proven effective without the ball, winning 8 games with less possession. They've shown strong resilience, winning 2 games after trailing at halftime Additionally, Their mental strength shows: 5 wins after conceding first Meanwhile, They've salvaged 17 points from losing positions this season. However, they've blown 3 leads after leading at halftime, showing vulnerability when ahead. Their game management needs work: 11 points dropped after taking the lead. Their game management is inconsistent: strong at comebacks but vulnerable when leading Additionally, They prefer direct play over possession, averaging 253 passes per game Meanwhile, Their attacking output is impressive: 16.5 shots per game, 5.5 finding the target. Defensively, they're aggressive (15.7 fouls/game). They're well-organized defensively (only 1.6 saves required per game). Positioned 6th, they're facing a team 5 places below them in the table.
a reactive side with 37% average possession
Read full analysisRWDM home games half time results
Patro Eisden away games half time results