Predictions for this day Calendar

Challenger Pro League

Cegeka Arena, Genk

KRC Genk II

1-4

HT: 1 - 4

FULL TIME

Patro Eisden

Challenger Pro League Standings

Current league table

#	Team	P	GD	Pts
1	SK Beveren	32	+51	88
2	Kortrijk	31	+23	64
3	Beerschot VA	32	+21	64
4	Lommel United	32	+13	53
5	Liège	32	+5	53
6	Patro Eisden	32	+4	51
7	AS Eupen	32	+8	47
8	Lokeren-Temse	32	+3	42
9	KAA Gent II	32	-9	41
10	K. Lierse S.K.	32	-7	38
11	RWDM	32	-4	36
12	Seraing United	31	-4	35
13	Francs Borains	32	-14	35
14	RSC Anderlecht II	32	-9	31
15	KRC Genk II	32	-17	31
16	Club Brugge II	32	-22	21
17	Olympic Charleroi	32	-42	16

Playing Style Analysis

KRC Genk II

They maintain balanced possession (48%). Despite often having less possession, they've won 3 games, demonstrating tactical flexibility Additionally, A concerning pattern: they've lost 5 games with more possession, showing vulnerability when expected to create Meanwhile, They've gained 9 points from losing positions, showing they fight until the end. A concerning pattern: they've lost 3 games despite leading at the break. They've struggled to protect leads, dropping 15 points from winning positions. As a lower-table side (15th), they'll need to be disciplined against a top-6 opponent.

KRC Genk II

They maintain balanced possession (48%)

Read full analysis

•They maintain balanced possession (48%).
•Despite often having less possession, they've won 3 games, demonstrating tactical flexibility.
•A concerning pattern: they've lost 5 games with more possession, showing vulnerability when expected to create.
•They've gained 9 points from losing positions, showing they fight until the end.
•A concerning pattern: they've lost 3 games despite leading at the break.
•They've struggled to protect leads, dropping 15 points from winning positions.
•As a lower-table side (15th), they'll need to be disciplined against a top-6 opponent.

Patro Eisden

A reactive side with 37% average possession. They've proven effective without the ball, winning 8 games with less possession. They've shown strong resilience, winning 2 games after trailing at halftime Additionally, Their mental strength shows: 5 wins after conceding first Meanwhile, They've salvaged 17 points from losing positions this season. However, they've blown 3 leads after leading at halftime, showing vulnerability when ahead. Their game management needs work: 11 points dropped after taking the lead. Their game management is inconsistent: strong at comebacks but vulnerable when leading Additionally, They prefer direct play over possession, averaging 253 passes per game Meanwhile, Their attacking output is impressive: 16.5 shots per game, 5.5 finding the target. Defensively, they're aggressive (15.7 fouls/game). They're well-organized defensively (only 1.6 saves required per game).

Patro Eisden

a reactive side with 37% average possession

Read full analysis

•a reactive side with 37% average possession.
•They've proven effective without the ball, winning 8 games with less possession.
•They've shown strong resilience, winning 2 games after trailing at halftime.
•Their mental strength shows: 5 wins after conceding first.
•They've salvaged 17 points from losing positions this season.
•However, they've blown 3 leads after leading at halftime, showing vulnerability when ahead.
•Their game management needs work: 11 points dropped after taking the lead.
•Their game management is inconsistent: strong at comebacks but vulnerable when leading.
•They prefer direct play over possession, averaging 253 passes per game.
•Their attacking output is impressive: 16.5 shots per game, 5.5 finding the target.
•Defensively, they're aggressive (15.7 fouls/game).
•They're well-organized defensively (only 1.6 saves required per game).